Anfield Index
·31 de enero de 2025
In partnership with
Yahoo sportsAnfield Index
·31 de enero de 2025
Liverpool’s summer transfer plans are already taking shape, and one of the latest names linked with a move to Anfield is El Hadji Malick Diouf. The Slavia Prague left-back has been the subject of reported interest from multiple Premier League clubs, with the Czech side’s sporting director confirming that Liverpool have enquired about him.
With the Reds likely to reinforce their left-back options under Arne Slot, Diouf’s profile is an interesting one. But is he the right fit for Liverpool’s system? In a recent Transfer Market Metrics podcast, Phil Barter joined Dave Davis to break down Diouf’s strengths, weaknesses, and whether he could realistically make the step up to Premier League football.
Diouf’s defensive statistics are impressive in certain areas, but there are some red flags that Liverpool’s recruitment team will need to consider. His aerial ability is a standout feature, with Barter noting that Diouf ranks in the 95th percentile for aerial duels—an exceptional number for a full-back.
However, his positional discipline and decision-making in defensive situations raise some concerns. As Barter highlighted, “Interceptions are at 82%, so he reads the game well, but his blocks are low—just 3%”. This could indicate that he relies more on anticipation rather than engaging in physical defensive actions, something that may not translate well to the intensity of Premier League football.
Another potential issue is his availability during the Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON). As Barter pointed out, “He plays for Senegal, which means he will disappear for AFCON, so you need to mitigate that”. This could be a crucial factor in Liverpool’s decision-making, especially given their already thin squad depth during international tournaments.
Liverpool’s left-backs are expected to contribute in the final third, and Diouf certainly fits that mould. His ability to carry the ball forward and receive progressive passes is elite, ranking in the 96th percentile for progressive passes received and penalty box touches.
“This guy is a carrier,” Barter explained. “He’s at 96% for progressive carries, so he’s picking the ball up and driving it forward.”
However, while his attacking intent is evident, his end product remains inconsistent. Despite taking a high number of shots for a full-back (98th percentile for shot volume), his actual goal contributions remain low. “His expected goals are high—95th percentile—but his assists are in the lower percentiles,” Barter added.
This suggests that while Diouf gets into dangerous positions, he lacks the final pass or finishing ability to truly impact the game at the highest level.
With Slavia Prague reportedly rejecting a €25 million (£19-20 million) bid, Liverpool would likely need to offer more to secure Diouf’s signature. But is he worth it?
Barter remains unconvinced that he is a priority signing, particularly when compared to other left-back targets Liverpool have been linked with, such as Rayan Aït-Nouri (Wolves), Milos Kerkez (Bournemouth), and Alex Grimaldo (Bayer Leverkusen).
“The £20 million might be worth a gamble, but I wouldn’t put him as a priority,” Barter stated. “Hato is still my number one choice because of what he offers defensively and going forward.”
There is also the question of whether Liverpool should be signing a squad player or a first-team-ready full-back. As Barter put it: “I don’t think he’s ready for a Premier League starting left-back position. If you’re improving the weakest link in your side, you need someone who can start.”
El Hadji Malick Diouf is an intriguing prospect—a physically dominant, attack-minded full-back with clear potential. His ability to progress the ball and his aerial strength are notable assets, but his defensive consistency and end product leave some doubts.
Given Liverpool’s left-back situation, Diouf could be a viable squad option, but he does not appear to be an immediate upgrade on the club’s existing options. With the price tag likely to exceed £20 million, Liverpool must decide whether he represents value for money or if other targets offer better short-term and long-term solutions.