Tactical Masterclass: How Liverpool Overpowered Manchester United | OneFootball

Tactical Masterclass: How Liverpool Overpowered Manchester United | OneFootball

In partnership with

Yahoo sports
Icon: Anfield Index

Anfield Index

·5 September 2024

Tactical Masterclass: How Liverpool Overpowered Manchester United

Article image:Tactical Masterclass: How Liverpool Overpowered Manchester United

Manchester United 0-3 Liverpool: Tactical and Statistical Analysis

Liverpool’s Premier League clash with Manchester United on Sunday offered a fascinating glimpse into the tactical nuances employed by both sides. Taking inspiration from a brilliant Twitter thread by Jimi (@borbely_imre), this analysis delves into the intricate details of how Liverpool outmanoeuvred their rivals. In a match filled with calculated pressing, intricate formations, and well-executed transitions, Liverpool’s tactical approach and collective performance stood out.

Pressing High with a 4-2-4 Formation

One of the key tactical elements Liverpool utilised was the 4-2-4 pressing system. As Manchester United attempted to play out from the back, Liverpool applied relentless pressure, forcing the opposition into hurried decisions. The diagram below highlights the moment Liverpool’s frontline positioned themselves to cut off United’s passing options, with Diaz, Jota, Salah, and Szoboszlai combining effectively to create traps for Manchester United’s defenders.


OneFootball Videos


This pressing structure ensured that United found it challenging to progress centrally. Gravenberch and Mac Allister were crucial in this regard, frequently positioning themselves to block passing lanes and regain possession. Gravenberch, in particular, combined defensive and offensive duties seamlessly, playing a pivotal role in transitions while also covering the central zones efficiently.

The 3-2 Build-Up Shape and Impact

Liverpool’s in-possession structure oscillated between a 3-2-5 and 3-2 build-up formation. During moments where United’s press wasn’t as aggressive, Liverpool used their back three—Van Dijk, Konaté, and Robertson—to orchestrate attacks. Alisson, stepping between Konaté and Van Dijk, acted as the pivot, facilitating quick ball movement from the back.

The presence of Gravenberch and Mac Allister as the double-pivot added another layer to Liverpool’s attack, as they constantly circulated the ball, connecting play with the front line. Mac Allister, in particular, shone in his role, completing 43 of 47 passes with an impressive 91% accuracy. His influence wasn’t limited to the build-up; he was also instrumental in defensive actions, recovering possession eight times and winning five tackles.

Szoboszlai’s Complex Role in Liverpool’s Attack

Szoboszlai, Liverpool’s new No. 10, was instrumental in both build-up and attacking phases. As demonstrated by the performance visual, his 90% passing accuracy and three chances created underline his value to the side. Not only did Szoboszlai dictate tempo, but he also made 10 recoveries and won three out of five ground duels, showcasing his all-around ability.

In attack, Szoboszlai linked up efficiently with the likes of Salah and Diaz, adding fluidity to Liverpool’s front line. This movement, along with his forward passes, helped Liverpool maintain a high tempo, often leaving United’s defenders scrambling to contain the pressure.

Creating Numerical Advantages in the Box

One of the most intriguing aspects of the match was how often Liverpool created numerical overloads inside United’s penalty area. The image below demonstrates a key moment when Diaz had possession, with Szoboszlai, Jota, Salah, and Trent Alexander-Arnold all joining the attack. This led to a 6v5 advantage in the box, giving Liverpool multiple passing options and creating chaos in United’s defensive structure.

In these instances, the fluidity and willingness of Liverpool’s midfield and forward players to push into attacking areas proved pivotal. Liverpool’s ability to create overloads and numerical superiority inside the box consistently allowed them to generate high-quality chances.

Defensive Organisation and Pressing Traps

Out of possession, Liverpool were equally impressive. Their pressing traps and defensive organisation stifled United’s attempts to bring the ball out from the back. The image below illustrates a typical scenario where Liverpool’s pressing caused United significant problems. The well-coordinated press limited United’s options, with Liverpool players aggressively closing down their counterparts and forcing turnovers.

This pressure resulted in a staggering 48 interceptions for Liverpool, compared to United’s 33. It was clear that Liverpool’s out-of-possession structure was designed to regain possession high up the pitch, creating dangerous attacking transitions.

Performance Data

Liverpool’s performance data against Manchester United paints an even more detailed picture of their dominance in the match. Their pressing, passing, and overall work rate were exemplary, with players like Mac Allister and Szoboszlai leading by example in key metrics.

Ball Progression Through Carries and Interceptions

Gravenberch, Salah, and Diaz were among the most effective at progressing the ball upfield through carries. The chart below shows how often these players successfully moved the ball forward, particularly in wide areas where they could exploit space behind United’s full-backs.

Szoboszlai’s role as the primary creator is further illustrated in his passing accuracy map. His accurate passes, especially in advanced areas, allowed Liverpool to maintain a fluid rhythm in attack while bypassing United’s midfield press.

Defensive Actions and Pressing Efficiency

In terms of defensive actions, Liverpool’s midfield trio of Szoboszlai, Gravenberch, and Mac Allister were crucial in controlling the central zones. The visual below illustrates how well they closed off passing lanes, especially when pressing high in United’s half.

Their pressing efficiency not only stifled United’s attempts to build from the back but also led to multiple high turnovers that transitioned into dangerous attacking opportunities.

Liverpool’s Tactical Masterclass

In the end, Liverpool’s tactical approach, both in possession and out of it, ensured they controlled the tempo of the game. Their ability to transition quickly, press efficiently, and create numerical overloads in key areas of the pitch led to a commanding performance. With three clean sheets in a row, thanks to Virgil van Dijk’s leadership at the back, Liverpool’s defensive solidity was the foundation of their dominance. Moving forward, their tactical balance between attack and defence will make them formidable challengers this season.

View publisher imprint