RB Leipzig considering move to sign Rasmus Hojlund | OneFootball

Manchester United, Rasmus Hojlund and the Sesko Equation

Manchester United’s ongoing pursuit of Benjamin Sesko has cast an uncertain shadow over the future of Rasmus Hojlund. It is a situation that encapsulates the cold mechanics of modern football: one striker being lined up, while another is left clinging to form, performances and hope.

A Fight Against Invisibility

In Chicago, under the lights of Soldier Field, Hojlund attempted to change the narrative. His sharp movement, aggressive pressing and ability to influence build-up play were all on show in United’s pre-season win over Bournemouth. His goal, even if disputed, served as a personal riposte.

Photo IMAGO

Amad’s shot brushed off Hojlund’s shin, but the striker immediately gestured to indicate intentional contact. “That desire for recognition is a sign of his current predicament,” as noted by The Athletic. The stadium announcer gave the goal to Amad, but Mason Mount’s finger-pointing to Hojlund made it clear who the players believed had earned it.

In such moments, football careers pivot. A brushed shin, a second goal ignored, a reaction observed, and suddenly the meta-narrative of a striker on the brink takes deeper hold.

Amorim’s Public Ambivalence

Ruben Amorim’s post-match comments offered no definitive comfort. “I am really happy with Rasmus,” he said. “I don’t know what is going to happen until the end of the market.” He went on: “The important thing is that Rasmus is scoring goals, he’s connecting really well with the team.” Supportive, yes. Reassuring? Not quite.

Photo IMAGO

This is the reality of top-level management. There is empathy, but little sentiment. Amorim is shaping a system and sees Sesko as the ideal piece. United’s admiration of the Slovenian striker is no secret, and while “many rounds of negotiations are expected”, the momentum of the chase says plenty.

Transfer Economics and Positional Clutter

There is a growing sense that United are creating options for themselves at Hojlund’s expense. If Sesko arrives, it is implausible that both 22-year-olds will be rotated equally, especially with Amorim’s preference for fluid forward lines.

Photo: IMAGO

Clubs are already circling. Borussia Dortmund and Newcastle are interested. RB Leipzig, Sesko’s current employers, have been linked in a potential swap, albeit with cash added by United given the gap in valuation.

Hojlund, brought in last year for a potential £72 million from Atalanta, now has a book value just under £45 million. United know that any departure would likely be at a financial loss, but may view that as the price of tactical evolution.

Future Hangs on Boardroom Calculations

United’s challenge is navigating the Financial Fair Play tightrope. The pursuit of Sesko might hinge less on Hojlund’s future and more on recouping fees elsewhere. Alejandro Garnacho and Antony are among those who could raise significant revenue. Chelsea, for example, have shown interest in Garnacho but “are holding tight”, offering surplus players like Nicolas Jackson and Christopher Nkunku instead of hard cash.

Photo IMAGO

The arithmetic is fluid, yet the consequence is fixed: United cannot fund this transition without outgoings, and Hojlund’s situation sits uncomfortably on that ledger.

For now, he stays, runs, scores and celebrates. But the ghost of the next striker hovers, and Hojlund’s response may be what determines whether he is part of the future or a remnant of last summer’s project.

Our View – EPL Index Analysis

If you’re a Manchester United fan, you’ve seen this script before. Another young player brought in for big money, barely into his tenure, and already the club are shopping in the same aisle. It is hard not to feel sympathy for Hojlund.

There was real excitement around his arrival. Not just because of the fee, but because he felt like a long-term investment in the No 9 role. Now, one summer later, the club are flirting with Sesko and fans are left wondering whether this was the plan all along or yet another impulse driven by short-term optics.

If Sesko arrives, what happens to Hojlund? Do they bench him? Do they sell him at a loss? Or worse, loan him out and watch him explode elsewhere? There’s a creeping fear this could become another Lukaku, another Depay, another player whose talent wasn’t nurtured in the right way.

And why Sesko? Good player, sure. But is he so much better that the club are willing to burn a £72 million project so soon? That raises deeper questions about the coherence of the club’s recruitment under INEOS and whether Amorim’s vision has room for the young players inherited from the previous regime.

Hojlund is doing what fans would want: scoring, grafting, showing heart. The risk now is that he pays the price for boardroom restlessness. If this club still stands for development and vision, it needs to prove it. Because right now, it looks more like another churn cycle than a coherent rebuild.