
EPL Index
·22 November 2023
Newcastle Takeover: Unveiling Premier League’s Role

In partnership with
Yahoo sportsEPL Index
·22 November 2023
In the world of football, few events can stir the pot as much as a high-profile club takeover. The recent revelation by The Athletic about the Premier League’s agreement with the Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF) to facilitate the takeover of Newcastle United is a case in point. This agreement, disclosed through emails obtained from the UK Foreign Office, throws a spotlight on the often-intricate relationship between sports, politics, and business.
The role of the UK government in this process cannot be understated. Premier League chief executive Richard Masters previously asserted that there was “no pressure applied” by the UK government in the decision that led to the Saudi PIF acquiring 80% of Newcastle United. However, the disclosed emails suggest otherwise, illustrating how closely intertwined government actions and sports deals can become.
Neil Crompton, the UK ambassador to Saudi Arabia, described how the Premier League had, in a conversation with another foreign office official, “agreed to settle differences with the PIF so that their investment in Newcastle can go ahead.” This statement, made just nine days before the takeover, indicates a level of governmental involvement that contradicts earlier claims of non-interference.
Moreover, the emails reveal two meetings held via Microsoft Teams between Foreign Office officials and the Premier League in the fortnight before the takeover. This proximity in timing and the nature of these discussions suggest a deeper level of engagement than previously acknowledged.
A significant detail is the communication plan prepared by the Foreign Office, ready to address both approval and rejection scenarios of the takeover. This level of preparedness implies anticipation of public and media scrutiny, indicating awareness of the deal’s sensitive nature.
The controversy surrounding the takeover extends beyond government involvement. Accusations of “sportswashing” emerged, given Saudi Arabia’s human rights record and the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi. A note from the Foreign Office argued that the takeover presented an opportunity to showcase Saudi Arabia’s progress, particularly in promoting female participation in sports. This stance reveals an attempt to balance economic interests with public relations, a tightrope walk in the global sporting arena.
The Premier League, for its part, declined formal comment but maintained through senior sources that the decision was based on legally binding assurances and not external influence. These assurances revolved around the separation of control, leading to Yasir Al-Rumayyan, the governor of PIF, becoming a non-executive chairman.
The insistence on a clear separation between club control and state influence was crucial in navigating the complex web of relationships and interests. However, the redacted nature of the emails and the reluctance to disclose full details suggest layers of complexity and sensitivity surrounding the deal.
This takeover is not just a boardroom affair. It has significant implications for the footballing world, Newcastle United fans, and the Premier League’s future. The entry of a fund as massive as the PIF, with $700 billion in assets, into the Premier League, marks a new era of financial power in football. It raises questions about the future balance of power within the league and the potential impact on competitive integrity.
For Newcastle United, this takeover represents a transformative moment. The influx of investment and resources can potentially elevate the club’s status in domestic and European competitions. However, it also brings a new set of expectations and scrutiny, both on and off the pitch.
In conclusion, the Newcastle United takeover saga exemplifies the intricate dance between sports, business, and politics. It’s a narrative that extends beyond the football pitch, encapsulating broader themes of power, influence, and ethical considerations. As this story continues to unfold, it serves as a reminder of the multifaceted nature of modern sports and the diverse stakeholders involved in shaping its landscape.