Why do fans get so angry when Arsenal players are criticized at the Euros? | OneFootball

Why do fans get so angry when Arsenal players are criticized at the Euros? | OneFootball

In partnership with

Yahoo sports
Icon: Just Arsenal News

Just Arsenal News

·1 July 2024

Why do fans get so angry when Arsenal players are criticized at the Euros?

Article image:Why do fans get so angry when Arsenal players are criticized at the Euros?

I have noticed a common theme throughout Euro 2024. There are Gooners getting increasingly sensitive about any Gunners performance being questioned with media accused of only doing so based on their Arsenal agenda.

Now I don’t know the age of every person who leaves a comment on the internet. I have seen YouTubers pull at this thread, asking how dare anyone ask for Saka to be dropped by England?


OneFootball Videos


Or how can anyone question the form of Declan Rice?

My assumption is though that this is just content providers looking for something to talk about while news is slow at the moment.

I have to believe that. If not, I have to deal with the reality that there are grown adults who think that the BBC, ITV, Talk Sport, etc have travelled to Germany and their coverage of the European Championship is undermined by their apparent obsession with the red half of North London?

I write and some read about the club we love. Some make a living out of talking about the side, garnering thousands of views and subscribers.

Some of my peers pay a fortune to follow Arsenal round the country, adapt their work schedule around the fixture list, give up time to be with their family because they are at the Emirates, etc.

It’s okay to be passionate or even fanatical about your interest.

Yet you need to have the awareness that not everyone is going to care as much as you. You might be obsessed but outside of your bubble other things are going on.

Whisper it quietly …….Arsenal are not special!

Our badge is not unique!

Our shirt is not on a pedestal!

We are no different to the hundreds of other teams in the UK.

Roy Keane doesn’t have our crest on his dart board!

Gary Neville isn’t waking up planning what dastardly thing he can say next about our football club.

Rio Ferdinand isn’t campaigning for players to be dropped based on who their employers are.

These are millionaires who have children, businesses and their own lives to focus on.

They give their opinion because that’s literally what they are paid to do. Their point of view isn’t built on being threatened by a team who haven’t won a title in 21 years!

Step back, say it out loud and if it doesn’t sound like it makes sense it’s probably because it doesn’t?

Why would pundits only be picking on Gunners?

Is that actually factual?

What is their motive?

Isn’t it more realistic that they are simply saying what they believe?

One theory was Saka was being spotlighted because of the colour of his skin. Yet fans now unhappy that Rice’s displays are now under scrutiny contradict that conspiracy.

Not that common sense always applies.

I love Rice, he was my Arsenal player of the season but that doesn’t make him immune from critique. The definition of a supporter isn’t based on always being positive for the sake it.

Outside of the back 4, have any of the Three Lions played well in the Group stages?

If you have not played well in three games, why is it wrong to suggest other options?

The Three Lions don’t have a replacement for Rice but if you have Carlton Palmer on the bench what’s wrong some wanting him to start?

If a player isn’t playing well and there is an alternative option what’s wrong with that being considered?

Mikel Arteta would do the same.

So be honest. Is Saka having a great tournament but being made a scapegoat because of his club?

Or have we not seen the best out of him in the last couple of weeks?

The reality is with the options Gareth Southgate has in attack none of his first team could complain if they got dropped in the knockout stages.

If it were only Arsenal representatives being mentioned, then that would be suspicious.

Yet in the last fortnight I have read / heard pleads for Harry Kane, Foden, Bellingham and Trent Arnold to either be subbed earlier or not start at all.

Anyone providing you with content failing to point that out either is doing so deliberately to get some clicks or is wearing Arsenal glasses so brightly they can’t see anything else.

If you don’t play well and you have quality substitutions your spot is up for grabs. That’s been the concept of football for decades.

It doesn’t matter your race, gender, sex, religion or club, it’s as simple as that.

The irony being if your saying Saka and Rice can’t he criticised because of who pays their wages isn’t that you being biased?

If your stance is zero Arsenal players can be dropped, then who really has the agenda?

Dan

View publisher imprint