
OneFootball
Lewis Ambrose·11 April 2020
đ€â What If ... Barcelona hired JosĂ© Mourinho over Pep Guardiola

In partnership with
Yahoo sportsOneFootball
Lewis Ambrose·11 April 2020
Cast your mind back to 2008.
Pep Guardiola was Barcelona B head coach but had no other experience as a manager.
First team boss Frank Rijkaard was leaving. José Mourinho was courted.
Barcelona made the surprise move for Guardiola, a decision that led them to the greatest era in their history.
But what if theyâd gone for Mourinho instead?
The golden age of Barcelona would have looked very different ⊠or may not have happened at all.
It must be remembered that Mourinho was at the very top of his game â he went on to win the treble with Inter two years later â Â and couldâve done something very special at Camp Nou. But he wouldâve had to do so without the same players.
Xavi already wanted to leave when Guardiola was appointed and needed convincing to stay. While Sergio Busquets and Pedro would have found the jump from B team to first-team much harder without Guardiola bringing them through.
Instead of intense pressing and constant control, Barcelona would have gone against the clubâs traditional values to play the Mourinho way.
Carles Puyol probably would have thrived with Eric Abidal and Gerard PiquĂ© in defence. Seydou KeĂŻta wouldâve been crucial in midfield alongside Yaya TourĂ©, who wouldnât agitate for a move to Manchester City after playing regularly in his favourite position.
With Xavi already gone, Andrés Iniesta would probably get the nod as a hard-working number 10.
Samuel Etoâo, Thierry Henry and Lionel Messi wouldâve given Mourinho his dream counterattacking machine and thereâs a chance this team would have won the treble in 2009 anyway, but we have our money on somebody else picking up the Champions League âŠ
Mourinhoâs 2008 Barcelona XI: ValdĂ©s; Alves, Puyol, PiquĂ©, Abidal; TourĂ©, KeĂŻta; Messi, Iniesta, Etoâo; Henry.
Thereâs little doubt Mourinho wouldâve had some success but long-term gains such as a lasting philosophy and player development would have been sacrificed and ageing players wouldnât be replaced by would-be La Masia graduates.
Mourinho would have exhausted those around him, fallen out with players, been criticised for his approach and left the club having burned all possible bridges by 2011.
What next, though?
Mourinho would have had an ambition to conquer Italy, though the way football moved on would have meant he never got his hands on the Champions League while in Serie A.
Heâd have then gone back to Spain to join â you know it â Real Madrid, hoping to upset Barcelona as much as possible.
By now itâs 2013 and Pep Guardiola (more on him later) is enjoying his time at Camp Nou. The two inevitably clashed but Guardiola â the man with the modern take on the modern game â wouldâve come out on top.
A return to Chelsea, honestly, seems like it was always inevitable and the Manchester United job was always on Mourinhoâs mind. Heâd have got himself there eventually.
It shouldnât ever be forgotten that JosĂ© Mourinho, despite all the stereotypes, has won a place in the hearts of Mesut Ăzil and Eden Hazard. And they have a place in his.
Ăzil is unique. There is no copy of him, not even a bad copy. He is the best No.10 in the world.
If Iâm now asked one coach with whom I want to work again, then I say: Mourinho.
So we can kiss goodbye the idea that Mourinho doesnât value gifted players who may not appear to be the most hard-working. Which brings us to Messi.
Under the Portuguese, Messi wouldâve been encouraged to work harder but never wouldâve moved centrally, the switch that all but secured his place as one of the very best players of all time. But he still wouldâve been used, he still would have delivered.
One thing about Messi is that he rarely â if ever â does anything flashy for the sake of it. And Mourinho wouldâve liked that about him.
It is, though, fair to say he likely wouldâve clashed with a coach who doesnât always encourage expressions and tends to value pragmatism over individual ability.
The chances of us seeing Messi in the Premier League at some point would have been much, much higher.
With Barcelona not quite the same force, Manchester United and Sir Alex Ferguson would have found a way to win the 2009 Champions League, becoming the first club to retain the trophy since Milan 20 years before.
Cristiano Ronaldo still left the club, though, to join Real Madrid. While there, he wouldnât play for Mourinho until much later in his career. Maybe his development would have been affected too?
Not to mention the fact he wouldnât have had the same Messi pushing him further and further to realise his full potential.
As for Sir Alex Fergusonâs side, they may well have gone on to also win Europeâs top prize in 2011, leaving the Scot on three Champions League titles and leaving the club even with Liverpoolâs then-British record of five.
Would Pep Guardiola, with his philosophy, really have worked alongside Mourinho at Barcelona? It seems unlikely.
Maybe he would have done one more year with the B team, waiting for his chance to step up, but who would have given it to a man with his modest CV?
Perhaps FC Porto â the club where Mourinho made his name â might have. The Portuguese club appointed AndrĂ© Villas-Boas, an ex-Mourinho pupil, in 2010 but Guardiola could have put himself forward for that job instead and revolutionised modern football from outside of Spain.
With Busquets and Pedro struggling to get into Mourinhoâs side, Guardiola could have whisked them away to Portugal, where theyâd have featured in some mightily impressive Champions League runs. Think Ajax in 2019.
And then? Well, Guardiola wouldâve gone back for the Barcelona job, of course, replacing Mourinho at Camp Nou in 2011.
But with Xavi gone and Messi not as developed, things wouldnât have been easy. Guardiola wouldâve gone a long way eventually â that much is clear â but we bet his trophy cabinet would be a whole lot emptier than it is right now.