Report: Chelsea weigh up £50m bid as goalkeeping concerns grow | OneFootball

Chelsea’s Goalkeeping Conundrum: Another Brighton Raid on the Horizon?

Verbruggen Emerges as a Target Amid Chelsea’s Search for Stability

For Chelsea, the search for a long-term No.1 continues in what feels like an annual ritual of trial and error. The latest candidate? Brighton & Hove Albion’s Bart Verbruggen, a goalkeeper who has impressed with his shot-stopping ability and composure in possession.

Photo IMAGO

According to GiveMeSport, Chelsea “are refusing to rule out” a summer move for the Dutch international, adding to their growing list of players recruited from the south coast. With Robert Sanchez, Marc Cucurella, and Moises Caicedo already making the well-trodden journey from the Amex Stadium to Stamford Bridge, Verbruggen could be next in line.

Chelsea’s Goalkeeping Uncertainty Sparks Fresh Transfer Interest

Chelsea’s goalkeeping situation has been unsettled for some time. Kepa Arrizabalaga was shipped out on loan, Robert Sanchez has been inconsistent, and Filip Jorgensen, signed from Villarreal for £20.7m, has yet to fully convince as a long-term solution.

Photo IMAGO

Now, as Enzo Maresca prepares for his first summer transfer window in charge, the club is exploring their options between the sticks once again. GiveMeSport sources suggest that influential figures at Stamford Bridge believe Verbruggen possesses the right attributes to become Chelsea’s first-choice goalkeeper for years to come.

However, Chelsea are not the only club in the race. Reports indicate that Bayern Munich and Manchester United are also keeping a close watch on the Brighton shot-stopper. United, in particular, are weighing up a move, with doubts lingering over Andre Onana’s long-term suitability after a mixed debut season in the Premier League.

Brighton Hold Firm Amid Growing Interest

Brighton’s stance on Verbruggen is clear. With over three years remaining on his contract, the Seagulls hold the advantage in negotiations and are reportedly demanding at least £50 million to entertain offers. Given their recent history of maximising player value, it would be no surprise if they stood firm on their valuation, particularly with multiple suitors involved.

Chelsea, however, have proven they are willing to spend. The club’s recruitment policy under the ownership of Todd Boehly and Clearlake Capital has been aggressive, particularly when it comes to young talent. Maresca may prefer to strengthen other areas first, but if goalkeeping errors continue to cost points, the pressure to act decisively will grow.

A Summer Shake-Up Looms at Stamford Bridge

Regardless of whether Chelsea make a move for Verbruggen, it seems inevitable that at least one current goalkeeper will depart in the summer. GiveMeSport reports that the club is on course to sell one of Sanchez, Jorgensen, Djordje Petrovic, or Mike Penders to make way for a new arrival.

Photo IMAGO

If Verbruggen is the chosen target, Chelsea will have to convince him that he will be their undisputed No.1, something Brighton have already provided him with. If there is one lesson to be learned from the Sanchez move, it’s that leaving the Amex for Stamford Bridge doesn’t guarantee a smooth transition.

With other goalkeeping targets such as Diogo Costa (Porto) and Caoimhin Kelleher (Liverpool) also on the shortlist, Chelsea will need to decide swiftly whether Verbruggen is worth the fight.

Photo: IMAGO

For now, Maresca has a decision to make: persist with his current options, or once again look to Brighton in the hope that their latest star can provide the stability Chelsea so desperately crave.

Our View – EPL Index Analysis

For Chelsea fans, this news hardly comes as a shock. The club’s approach to squad building over the last two seasons has been a mix of expensive gambles and hopeful fixes, with no clear long-term plan in sight.

The idea of spending £50m on another Brighton player—after the mixed success of Sanchez, Cucurella, and Caicedo—raises immediate concerns. Haven’t Chelsea learned their lesson by now?

Sanchez, bought to replace Kepa, has not been the transformational upgrade many had hoped for. Jorgensen’s arrival last summer was supposed to add competition, yet the club now seems prepared to move on from him already. Where is the consistency in recruitment?

Verbruggen is undoubtedly a talented goalkeeper, but spending big on him feels risky, particularly when Chelsea’s issues run far deeper than just goalkeeping. The team lacks cohesion, defensive stability, and a reliable striker—why prioritise another expensive project in goal when bigger concerns exist elsewhere?

Then there’s Brighton’s negotiation stance. They have no need to sell, especially with Bayern and Manchester United circling. If Chelsea want Verbruggen, they will likely have to overpay once again. Given the club’s Financial Fair Play considerations, is this really the best use of resources?

A more pressing concern should be how Chelsea utilise the goalkeepers already at their disposal. Petrovic showed promise last season, yet he has been overlooked. If the club moves for Verbruggen, does that mean another high-potential goalkeeper is discarded before being given a proper chance?

For many Chelsea fans, this deal feels like yet another expensive roll of the dice, rather than a carefully considered solution. If the past two seasons have taught us anything, it’s that spending money doesn’t guarantee success—especially if it lacks a clear, long-term strategy.